Fixing Natural Gas Leaks on Public Lands is Pro-Life and Good Stewardship
We Oppose the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to Invalidate the BLM Methane Regulations
As pro-life evangelicals, we have a special concern for the unborn. We want children to be born healthy and unhindered by the ravages of pollution even before they take their first breadth.
That’s why nearly 92,000 pro-life Christians from 21 affected states want strong action to reduce pollution from leaks in our natural gas infrastructure and from venting and flaring. These things spew out smog precursors, as well as other toxic pollutants and cancer-causing agents like benzene. Studies have shown that smog, VOCs, and air toxics have a disproportionate impact upon life in the womb; for those near production sites the emissions have been linked to birth defects and pre-term births. The same study clearly demonstrates 84% of published medical studies delineate health impacts from natural gas infrastructure.
In addition to protecting the unborn, as evangelical Christians we want our country’s policies to reflect good resource and financial stewardship. The leaks, venting, and flaring of such a valuable national resource is the opposite of good stewardship. In a 2014 study the Western Values Project estimated that “American taxpayers could conservatively lose almost $800 million over the next decade due to natural gas being flared or vented from federal lands.” This money could be used to help fund education, or infrastructure, or for tax rebates – just about anything rather than let it disappear in the air.
Therefore, we at the Evangelical Environmental Network (EEN) want strong action to reduce this pollution and support the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) rule released in November 2016. We oppose any act by Congress, including a CRA, to weaken or invalidate this BLM rule.
 For recent studies on health impacts, including for the unborn, see: Jake Hays and Seth B. C. Shonkoff, “Toward anUnderstanding of the Environmental and Public Health Impacts of Unconventional Natural Gas Development: A Categorical Assessment of the Peer-Reviewed Scientific Luterature, 2009-2015, PLoS ONE, 11 (4), April 20, 2016; Shaina L. Stacy et al., “Perinatal Outcomes and Unconventional Natural Gas Operations in Southwest Pennsylvania,” PLoS ONE 10 (6), June 3, 2015; Gregg P. Macey, et al., “Air Concentrations of Volatile Compounds Near Oil and Gas Production: a Community-based Exploratory Study,” Environmental Health, 32 (2014).